GiveFeedback captures voice, visible screen state, interaction data, and page context — then structures it into a developer-ready task with replay evidence and targeted follow-up questions when something's ambiguous.
"I like the layout, but this section feels overwhelming and I can't tell which plan is the default."
Reviewer hesitated on the pricing section, scanned across all three cards, and said the default option was unclear.
"Which plan should feel recommended by default: Growth or Scale?"
Emotional language is separated from the actual requested change — no interpretation needed on your end.
The spoken note is bound to exactly what was visible — not a memory of the page from three days later.
Clarification comes back through the widget, while the reviewer is still looking at the thing they flagged.
Which kind of change are you asking for here?
Do you want the pricing card to feel less busy or just shorter?
Was the issue visible on desktop, mobile, or both?
Which CTA should stay primary after the rewrite?
"Desktop and mobile. The problem is strongest on mobile because the cards stack and the CTA hierarchy disappears."
Transcription alone loses most of the signal. The visible page, cursor path, and hesitation timing are what turn a voice note into a task specific enough to ship without a follow-up thread.
Intent, emotion, expected outcome
Viewport, visible UI state, current page
Clicks, hovers, scroll depth, timing
DOM references, metadata, task history
Capture the full context, structure it automatically, and ask the one clarifying question before the reviewer closes the tab.